JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 1, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Desacato
  • Alcance
  • Concepto
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida
  • Seguimiento a la orden vigésima séptima de la Sentencia T-760 de 2008
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El ciudadano William Arturo Vizcaíno Tovar solicitó a la Sala de Seguimiento de la sentencia T-760/08declarar el desacato del Auto 263/13 por parte del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, al incumplir algunas de sus disposiciones con la expedición de la Resolución 5395 de 2013.

Se decide no iniciar el trámite incidental propuesto por el memorialista, en razón a que la Corte se encuentra analizado la información hasta ahora remitida por el Ministerio referido y a la espera de otra requerida.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. No iniciar el tramite incidental de desacato solicitado por el ciudadano William Arturo Vizcaino Tovar, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Incorporar el escrito de la referencia y la respuesta remitida por el Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social al expediente del Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-760 de 2008, orden vigesima septima.
  3. Tercero. Proceda la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion a comunicar esta decision al peticionario, acompanando copia de la misma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.